Daily Mail PH

Tuesday, November 14, 2023

[New post] Crypto Industry Fights Back Against Controversial New IRS Tax Proposal

Site logo image Oliver Dale posted: "The crypto industry is up in arms over a controversial new proposal from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that aims to establish a taxation framework for digital assets. The proposal has attracted a flood of over 120,000 public comments, mostly opposing" Blockonomi

Crypto Industry Fights Back Against Controversial New IRS Tax Proposal

Oliver Dale

Nov 14

The crypto industry is up in arms over a controversial new proposal from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that aims to establish a taxation framework for digital assets. The proposal has attracted a flood of over 120,000 public comments, mostly opposing the new rules.


Keypoints

  • The IRS held an audio-only hearing to gather views from the crypto industry on a proposed new tax approach for cryptocurrencies.
  • The industry has major concerns about the proposal, including threats to user privacy, the broad scope of crypto entities that would have to report transactions, the inclusion of stablecoins, and whether it implies cryptocurrencies are securities.
  • The proposal defines "broker" broadly, which could require tax reporting from decentralized organizations like DeFi platforms and DAOs that would have difficulty complying.
  • Over 120,000 public comments were submitted on the proposal, showing significant opposition from the crypto industry.
  • Industry groups argue the IRS is overstepping its authority and the proposal could violate privacy rights and harm innovation.
  • Despite objections, having clear crypto tax rules could eliminate uncertainty and facilitate wider crypto adoption. The proposal would establish a new tax form for reporting crypto gains.
  • If finalized before SEC crypto regulations, this proposal would be the first major official framework for crypto's status in US finance.

At an IRS hearing on Monday, crypto advocates laid out arguments against the proposal, which outlines reporting requirements for crypto "brokers" and investors. But the industry argues the rules are too broad, threaten privacy, and could harm innovation.

A major concern is the expansive definition of "broker" which would rope in decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), and wallet providers. These entities would have difficulty complying with tax reporting. Industry groups say the IRS is overstepping its authority by trying to regulate decentralized tech.

Today we filed a comment in response to Treasury's proposed broker rule.

The proposed regulations reflect fundamental misunderstandings about the nature of digital assets and decentralized technology, more broadly.@MTCoppel breaks down our comment 👇https://t.co/zgNhwWREf3 https://t.co/ul7JTvCt5q pic.twitter.com/UfkR4bKaJn

— Blockchain Association (@BlockchainAssn) November 13, 2023

The rules could also undermine user privacy by allowing extensive government tracking of crypto transactions. Some claim this is an unprecedented invasion of Americans' personal lives and decisions.

However, establishing a clear crypto tax framework would eliminate uncertainty and could facilitate wider adoption. The proposal introduces a new tax form for reporting crypto gains, similar to existing forms for stock investors.

If finalized before SEC crypto regulations, the IRS proposal would be the first official framework recognizing cryptocurrencies' status in US finance. But with major industry opposition, the IRS will need to carefully weigh feedback before proceeding. The crypto sector argues the rules must be significantly narrowed to protect innovation and civil liberties.

This battle underscores the challenges of regulating a novel technology like crypto. But clear tax policy remains critical for growing the industry within the bounds of law. The coming months will determine if the IRS and crypto community can reach a workable compromise.


Manage your email settings or unsubscribe.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
https://blockonomi.com/crypto-industry-fights-back-against-controversial-new-irs-tax-proposal/

WordPress.com and Jetpack Logos

Get the Jetpack app to use Reader anywhere, anytime

Follow your favorite sites, save posts to read later, and get real-time notifications for likes and comments.

Download Jetpack on Google Play Download Jetpack from the App Store
WordPress.com on Twitter WordPress.com on Facebook WordPress.com on Instagram WordPress.com on YouTube
WordPress.com Logo and Wordmark title=

Automattic, Inc. - 60 29th St. #343, San Francisco, CA 94110  

at November 14, 2023
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

[INVITATION] Ask Me Anything with Jodesz Gavilan: Investigating Martin Romualdez’s properties

Courage doesn't live in headlines. It lives in people.   17 January 2026 View in Browser     Former House speaker Martin Romualdez h...

  • [New post] Achieve Data Sovereignty through Omnisphere
    Crypto Breaking News posted: "Web 3.0 is one of the biggest buzzwords flying around the world of social media this year. An...
  • [New post] Tuesday’s politics thread is trying to stay positive.
    SheleetaHam posted: " Even though I just finished the latest Opening Arguments podcast about how Roe v. Wade is toast, and ...
  • [New post] Is XRP going to take the Crypto market by storm
    admin posted: "Is XRP going to take the Crypto market by storm While the SEC has been going after Ripple in court the XRP b...

Search This Blog

  • Home

About Me

Daily Newsletters PH
View my complete profile

Report Abuse

Labels

  • Last Minute Online News

Blog Archive

  • January 2026 (2)
  • December 2025 (8)
  • November 2025 (4)
  • October 2025 (2)
  • September 2025 (1)
  • August 2025 (2)
  • July 2025 (5)
  • June 2025 (3)
  • May 2025 (2)
  • April 2025 (2)
  • February 2025 (2)
  • December 2024 (1)
  • October 2024 (2)
  • September 2024 (1459)
  • August 2024 (1360)
  • July 2024 (1614)
  • June 2024 (1394)
  • May 2024 (1376)
  • April 2024 (1440)
  • March 2024 (1688)
  • February 2024 (2833)
  • January 2024 (3130)
  • December 2023 (3057)
  • November 2023 (2826)
  • October 2023 (2228)
  • September 2023 (2118)
  • August 2023 (2611)
  • July 2023 (2736)
  • June 2023 (2844)
  • May 2023 (2749)
  • April 2023 (2407)
  • March 2023 (2810)
  • February 2023 (2508)
  • January 2023 (3052)
  • December 2022 (2844)
  • November 2022 (2673)
  • October 2022 (2196)
  • September 2022 (1973)
  • August 2022 (2306)
  • July 2022 (2294)
  • June 2022 (2363)
  • May 2022 (2299)
  • April 2022 (2233)
  • March 2022 (1993)
  • February 2022 (1358)
  • January 2022 (1323)
  • December 2021 (2064)
  • November 2021 (3141)
  • October 2021 (3240)
  • September 2021 (3135)
  • August 2021 (1782)
  • May 2021 (136)
  • April 2021 (294)
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.