The utilization of Chat GPT or any AI tools without proper authorization and compensation to the data owner sets a dangerous precedent, especially within the legal domain.
It is imperative for the court to steer clear of such illicit technology, possibly stemming from a lack of understanding of its intricacies. The data cut-off in chatbots is limited to 2021, raising concerns about the accuracy and relevance of information post that period.
While the use of AI by judges for personal purposes may be acceptable, relying on AI tools for matters concerning justice is a risky endeavor.
Instances from other countries have shown AI tools generating fictitious case laws and facts, leading to regrettable outcomes in court proceedings.
Despite being a frequent user of AI, I acknowledge the inherent limitations and risks associated with this technology, particularly in terms of privacy invasion. AI's reliance on unconsented data usage and lack of transparency in its training process pose significant challenges, especially in critical fields like law and medicine where human lives are at stake.
Instead of endorsing illegal technological practices, courts should explore legitimate avenues for information gathering, such as utilizing Amicus Curiae for specialized knowledge.
There should be strict provisions in place to hold courts and judges accountable for any misuse of AI, as it remains a biased tool under the control of the judiciary.
AIethics #DataOwnership #LegalTech #UnauthorizedUtilization #CompensationMatters #DangerousPrecedent #UnderstandingAI #IntricaciesOfTechnology #ChatbotConcerns #DataAccuracy #DataRelevance #AIinJustice #RiskyEndeavor #FictitiousCaseLaws #RegrettableOutcomes #LimitationsofAI #PrivacyInvasion #TransparencyIssues #ChallengesInLaw #ChallengesInMedicine #LegitimateAvenues #AmicusCuriae #AccountabilityInCourts #BiasedAI #JudicialControl
No comments:
Post a Comment