It is imperative for the courts to shift the burden of medical expenses from the parents to the hospital or a religious institution, as the financial strain of keeping a loved one alive can be overwhelming.
Medical expenses are a significant financial responsibility that often requires insurance coverage or loans, and government and courts fail to recognize this.
Parents should not be forced to bear the entire cost of treatment, especially when hospitals are known to withhold bodies due to unpaid bills, resulting in unnecessary deaths.
Courts need to acknowledge that parents will go to great lengths to save their child, but when they reach the court, they are often financially drained and unable to generate more funds.
The legal system should not rely solely on past judgments, but rather strive to set new precedents that address the complexities of medical expenses and the ethical dilemmas surrounding life-saving treatments.
While mercy killing may be prone to misuse in India, particularly in affluent families seeking to inherit businesses and properties, it can also be a means for less privileged individuals to provide a dignified end to their loved ones' suffering.
Courts should consider allowing mercy killing on a case-by-case basis or covering the medical expenses of such victims, as the exorbitant costs often push families into financial ruin while healthcare professionals benefit from the lucrative industry.
MedicalExpensesBurden #FinancialStrainRelief #LegalSystemResponsibility #ParentalFinancialSupport #EthicalDilemmasCourts #NewPrecedentsNeeded #MercyKillingMisuse #DignifiedEndSuffering #CaseByCaseMercyKilling #HealthcareIndustryProfit #FinancialRuinPrevention #MedicalExpensesCoverage #CourtInterventionNeeded #LifeSavingTreatments #LegalSystemReform #FinancialResponsibilityRecognition #UnnecessaryDeathsPrevention #MedicalExpensesComplexities #ParentalFinancialDrain #TaxpayerBurden
No comments:
Post a Comment